In Beth Duff-Brown’s, “Customer Service Calls Routed
to India,” she combines the use of a precise and strong tone coming from her
diction and writing style, professional yet personal diction, and use of
rhetorical devices, to work in harmony to strongly support the arguments she
makes in her article.
Duff-Brown’s tone in her article “Customer Service
Calls Routed to India” is detectable throughout her article. By examining her
use of diction, one can infer her tone both through her choice of words, and
her writing style. Because Duff-Brown’s diction is very intellectual, although
very personal and not too “tight up,” as one would say, she creates a tone of
formality, but personal connection to the reader, as if she were speaking
directly to her audience. Duff-Brown’s writing style support her unique tone
because of the way her words flow, and how she accurately made a great choice
on words to support her arguments in this article. Because her tone is strong,
it gives the audience a sense that they are not reading just another news
article, but one coming from a reliable, and identifiable, knowledgeable
source. Duff- Brown also throws in hints of comedy and humor into her article,
also altering her tone into being still formal, but casual and lighthearted at
the same time. This not only builds her ethos, but it also pulls in readers.
Her tone is used precisely to pull in readers and keep them in the article’s
grasp with its uniqueness. By using this slightly modifying, unique tone,
Duff-Brown achieves a strong argument in this article because her tone, which
is part of the structure of her article, is strong, memorable, and strengthens her
argument alongside her writing style.
Duff-Brown’s choice of words reflects her writing
style, and the argument itself. Examples of Duff-Brown’s strong use of diction
reflect when she says, “the city is awash with tech billboards and knapsack-laden
geeks in a hurry,” where her choice of words build a mental image for the
reader, while still keeping her professionalism and slight seriousness in her
article. Because she writes in such a flowing manner, her diction is what makes
reading this article smooth, and makes the audience or the reader feel that she
is speaking personally to them. She builds this “relationship” with her
audience, but keeps it professional at the same time. Her diction supports her
argument because with the use of words and phrases like “intellectuals,” “work
conditions,” “deregulation,” and “globalization,” she builds her argument in
terms of the meanings of these words and how they support it. A perfect example
of this correlation between diction and the strength of her argument is when
Duff-Brown says, “Website designers here have left for overseas companies or
work in Bangalore for them, filling the technology vacuum in the United States,
Britain and other European countries.”
Using rhetorical devices of ethos and pathos, Duff-Brown
successfully applies these to her article which ultimately strengthens it by
drawing in the audience, and maintaining their attention. Throughout her
article, Duff-Brown strengthens her ethos by building a connection with her
audience. She qualifies her argument by using quotes from other sources such as
Arhundati Roy, and showing knowledge in the topic of globalization and
outsourcing/offshoring. She introduces the story of “Betty,” as if she were
speaking directly through the audience instead of this being text. This builds
her ethos and her connection to the audience overall. Duff-Brown’s use of
statistics and quotes from other sources also builds her ethos by showing her
outside knowledge and strengthens her argument by providing actual data and
proof of claims she makes. Duff-Brown’s use of slight humor throughout the
article also strengthens her argument. When she says, “they bone up on sports
terms and slang and a good dose of Baywatch and Friends to bridge the cultural
divide between Boston and Bombay,” one can note the slight use of humor she
uses in her article. This humor is the use of the rhetorical device of pathos,
which is one of the strongest in strengthening an argument through audience connection.
Duff- Brown’s
combination of a precise and strong tone, professional yet personal diction,
and use of rhetorical devices, works to strongly support the arguments she
makes in her article. Her audience is captivated by her tone through her
writing style, her diction, and her use of pathos and ethos. As the audience is
pulled in by these devices, her argument is qualified and strengthened, making
her article successful in serving its purpose.
Brisa, this is a very thorough analysis of which rhetorical techniques she uses, and your writing is clear and articulate. The only thing missing is a sense of what Duff-Brown's argument is. Show us the connection between what exactly she says and how she is saying it--so don't say "the argument is effective"; tell us that "her humor builds credibility to the argument that these workers are losing their cultural identity because the humor allows us to sympathize, to not feel guilty that we might be complicit in their loss." Or something like that to connect the HOW with the WHAT. Does that make sense?
ReplyDelete